基于AHP-FCE方法的矿山地质环境评价
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

湖南科技大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Evaluation of Mine Geological Environment Based on the AHP-FCE Method
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Hunan University of Science and Technology;2.Hunan University of Sci and Technology ience

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    对于复杂的矿山地质环境系统,为减少人为主观影响从而进行定量评价,以茂名市油页岩-高岭土矿区为例,选取自然地理、基础地质、矿山环境3要素下的12个评价因子作为评价指标并构建评价体系与分级标准,基于层次分析法(AHP)确定各评价指标的权重,结合模糊数学(FCE)构建评价模型对矿山地质环境进行评价,二级初判结果显示自然地理、基础地质、矿山环境为差,主要存在问题为地形地貌景观破坏、土地资源破坏及地质灾害。一级评判结果为研究区矿山地质环境总体为差,评价结果与实际情况符合,可为后续矿山地质环境治理与生态修复提供依据。

    Abstract:

    For complex mining geological environment systems, in order to reduce human subjective influence and perform quantitative evaluation, taking the oil shale-kaolin mining area in Maoming City as an example, 12 evaluation factors under three elements—natural geography, basic geology, and mining environment—were selected as evaluation indicators to construct an evaluation system and grading standards. The weights of each evaluation indicator were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and a comprehensive evaluation model was developed by combining Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE) to assess the mining geological environment. The secondary evaluation results show that the natural geography, basic geology, and mining environment were rated as "poor," with major issues including the destruction of geomorphological landscapes, land resource degradation, and geological hazards.? The primary evaluation results indicate that the overall mining geological environment of the study area is rated as "poor." The evaluation results are consistent with the actual situation and can provide a basis for subsequent mining geological environment management and ecological restoration.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-27
  • 最后修改日期:2025-01-05
  • 录用日期:2025-01-06
  • 在线发布日期: